Thoughts on Singapore Architecture [part 2 of 2]

[Image: Mr Tai Lee Siang, Source: Mr Tai Lee Siang].

In the first part of the interview, FFW Magazine and Mr Tai Lee Siang talked about the relationship between architecture and the society at large. This week, their conversation focuses on the Singapore architecture scene itself, examining the local architecture scene and their position within the larger realm of architecture.

The conversation steers towards taking a good look at ourselves and asking if we are as good as we believe we are. Also, FFW Magazine asks Mr Tai if we are contributing enough to the world of architecture. To adapt a famous quote, “Ask not what architecture can do for you but ask what you can do for architecture”.

————————————

FFW:In your opinion, how is the culture of discourse and agitation within the fraternity important in the development of Singapore’s architecture?

LS: I am interested to understand the word “agitation�. Singapore’s architects since independence can be loosely defined by 3 generations: The Pioneers, The Shakers and The Movers. The Pioneers established Singapore’s architecture scene in the 60s and 70s with such landmarks as People’s Park, Golden Mile Complex, NTUC Conference Hall and the SPUR movement. The Shakers helped sustain Singapore architecture through the 70s, 80s crisis with ethical professional practice and beginning of globalisation. The Movers are the ones who successfully synthesize Singapore’s architecture strengths and take them abroad with greater recognition in the 90s and present. There are also ever-greens who thread through the 3 periods. The common trend amongst all is the survival instinct and passion albeit diverse at times. The challenge faced by Singapore’s architects is recognition that all 3 generations must now come together to overcome the challenges of the future. Discourse alone is not enough. A collective effort in an increasingly challenging practice environment is a must. Due to the relatively small size of the fraternity, togetherness is strength.

FFW: Much has been said about Singapore’s architects gaining more recognition from their peers in the region and also in other parts of the world. The success of firms like DP, WOHA and SCDA seems to suggest that we are establishing ourselves as a design force. What are your comments on this?

LS: Singapore architects are fast establising themselves as competent design force. Note the word “competent�. While it means that we are strong, capable and reliable, it does not always mean high level of creativity and greatness. Singapore firms are quick to respond to commercial forces and are even able to carve a niche in the creative spectrum of architecture exploration. However, this is not sufficient if Singapore architects are to be a creative design force. More firms need to develop specialised design skill sets that complement each other instead of being generalists. For example, some smaller practices could develop special skills in creative use of sustainable construction materials. In this way, Singapore could become the creative hub of architecture practices thus strenthening ourselves in the face of global competition.

FFW: What do you feel is the Singapore’s architect contribution to the larger architectural scene?

LS: ‘INSUFFICIENT’ is the answer. Singapore architects have been a silent successful group. We may have been successful but not very socially and intellectually engaging with the larger architectural scene. To promote Singapore architects as creative and strong, we must have substance and a voice. The former is a must and the latter a necessity. Singaproe architects must begin to be a strong voice in the local community to lead discussion on environment and architecture. We must be the champion for good architecture and built environment. Given the strong home base, we now have the right conditions to not only penetrate new overseas markets; we need to contribute to the well being of other environments. We must also play a leadership role in the larger architectural scene to influence and engage the best in the world. All these point to one thing, Singapore’s architects must now speak out.

The one thing I would change about the architecture scene in Singapore is…

LS: To see Singapore become the most architecturally exciting and sustainable city in the world.

If I were a piece of Architecture, I would be…

LS: I would still prefer to be a very good architect.

Adib is the co-founder of 5ft Creatives and he loves to walk on the FIVEFOOTWAY.